# MiMo-V2.5 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 40.8 to 19.5.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.4 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 93 | 254 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1210 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1208 |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1208 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1247 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.5 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.