# MiMo-V2.5 vs Mistral Nemo

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-mistral-nemo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.8 to 28.6.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2.5.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 25.9 |
| Rank | 89 | 332 |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.5: —
- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)
- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.63 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)
- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1436 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)
- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1459 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | — |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1412 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1444 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)
- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Mistral Nemo?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5 lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Mistral Nemo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.