# MiMo-V2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.1

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-minimax-m2-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 7 categories and MiniMax-M2.1 in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 27.8 to 15.8.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.1.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 38.4 |
| Rank | 89 | 177 |
| Context | 1.05M | 205K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 40.1 (#132)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | 1384 |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1421 |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | 623.83 |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2.5: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 27.7 (#91)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 36.6% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 15.8 (#301)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1410 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 11.2% |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 35.6 (#142)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1396 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 37.7 (#143)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1459 | 1432 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.8% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)
- MiniMax-M2.1: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 50.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1430 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1405 |
| LMArena German | 1421 | 1380 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1304 | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 1297 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1386 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1412 | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 74.0 (#108)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1399 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#98)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1444 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 58.5 (#114)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1362 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1396 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5 better than MiniMax-M2.1?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or MiniMax-M2.1?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.1 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

### Is MiMo-V2.5 or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.