# MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.5 costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 43.6.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 46.7 |
| Rank | 89 | 55 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | 1618 |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1538 |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1511 |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1497 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1459 | 1548 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | 1265 |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1481 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1412 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1490 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1444 | 1500 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1463 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.5 costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 43.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.