# MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 43.4 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.5 costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 61.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 43.1% for MiMo-V2.5 and 50.2% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.4 | 45.2 |
| Rank | 93 | 74 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | 1479 |
| SciCode | 43.1% | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1503 |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | 899.8 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 3.7% | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1488 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 16% | 22% |
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1481 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1503 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1247 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1488 |
| LMArena German | 1421 | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1306 | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | 1471 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | 1477 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 1483 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 43.4 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.5 costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 43.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.