# MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Trinity Large Thinking

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 47.0 to 33.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 34.4% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and 16.5% for Trinity Large Thinking.
- Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 44.8 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 70 | 180 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1477 | 1238 |
| SciCode | 50.2% | 36.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1502 | 1381 |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | 16.5% |
| CritPt | 4% | 0.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1487 | 1350 |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1480 | 1366 |
| ProofBench | 22% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1359 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1372 |
| LMArena French | 1489 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1455 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1418 | 1312 |
| LMArena Korean | 1436 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1338 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1470 | 1356 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1342 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Trinity Large Thinking?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Trinity Large Thinking share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.