# MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs QwQ-32B

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and QwQ-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.5 to 50.9.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.8 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 70 | 153 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1502 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1477 | — |
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1487 | 1326 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | — |
| CritPt | 4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1480 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| ProofBench | 22% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1323 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1489 | 1337 |
| LMArena German | 1455 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1418 | 1263 |
| LMArena Korean | 1436 | 1278 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1470 | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1288 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | 1257 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than QwQ-32B?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or QwQ-32B better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and QwQ-32B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.