# MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.2 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 30.8 to 26.8.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.2 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 74 | 71 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1503 | 1487 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1479 | — |
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1483 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | — |
| CritPt | 4% | — |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1474 |
| ProofBench | 22% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1503 | 1489 |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1484 |
| LMArena German | 1458 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1412 | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | 1437 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | 1467 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | 1476 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1478 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.2 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.