# MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen Max

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 38.6 to 21.0.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 33K.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.8 | 34.4 |
| Rank | 70 | 226 |
| Context | 1.05M | 33K |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | $6.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1502 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1477 | — |
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)
- Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1487 | 1270 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | — |
| CritPt | 4% | — |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)
- Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1480 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| ProofBench | 22% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)
- Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1489 | 1329 |
| LMArena German | 1455 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1418 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1436 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1470 | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)
- Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1289 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)
- Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1277 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Qwen Max?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Qwen Max?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.

### Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Qwen Max better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.