# MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Phi-4 Mini

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 4.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro-vs-phi-4-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Phi-4 Mini in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 47.4 to 28.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 50.2% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and 10.8% for Phi-4 Mini.
- Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 45.2 | 30.9 |
| Rank | 74 | 283 |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | $0.075 |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | $0.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
- Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | 10.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1479 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1503 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
- Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 4% | 0% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | — |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 22% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
- Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1503 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Phi-4 Mini?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 4.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Phi-4 Mini?

Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Phi-4 Mini share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.