# MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Mistral

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro-vs-mistral
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.5 to 37.2.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 44.8 | 29.4 |
| Rank | 70 | 297 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)
- Mistral: 33.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1502 | 1162 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1477 | — |
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)
- Mistral: 21.3 (#199)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1487 | 1149 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | — |
| CritPt | 4% | — |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)
- Mistral: 20.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1480 | 1180 |
| ProofBench | 22% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 7.2% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)
- Mistral: 16.3 (#283)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1125 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 27.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.3% |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)
- Mistral: 33.0 (#249)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | 1129 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1109 |
| LMArena French | 1489 | 1179 |
| LMArena German | 1455 | 1155 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1418 | 1012 |
| LMArena Korean | 1436 | 1032 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1168 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1470 | 1143 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)
- Mistral: 52.9 (#283)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | 1152 |
| IFEval | — | 56.8% |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)
- Mistral: 35.0 (#240)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1154 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)
- Mistral: 37.2 (#255)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1165 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1158 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1147 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
| WildBench | — | 66% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Mistral?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Mistral better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Mistral share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.