# Mercury vs Qwen3.8 Max

> Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-vs-qwen3-8-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 54.4 to 17.5.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 56.8 |
| Rank | 199 | 22 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mercury: 38.7 (#170)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1502 |
| DeepSWE | — | 57.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1674 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 17.8% |
| SciCode | — | 53.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mercury: —
- Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 63.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 55.1% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.2% |

## Reasoning

- Mercury: 17.5 (#293)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1285 | 1496 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 88.3% |
| CritPt | — | 20% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 38% |
| DTBench | — | 92% |
| LMCA | — | 46.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.41 |

## Math

- Mercury: —
- Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 100% |
| ProofBench | — | 58% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1499 |

## Knowledge

- Mercury: —
- Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 47.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1507 |

## Multimodal

- Mercury: —
- Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1314 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20% |

## Multilingual

- Mercury: 41.6 (#206)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1538 |
| LMArena French | — | 1503 |
| LMArena German | — | 1483 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1467 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1461 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1481 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1492 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury: 65.2 (#224)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1479 |

## Long Context

- Mercury: 38.4 (#198)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | 1489 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury: 46.2 (#221)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1483 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1191 | 1479 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1282 | 1489 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mercury or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury and Qwen3.8 Max share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.