# Mercury vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 39.3 to 17.5.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 199 | 72 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mercury: 38.7 (#170)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mercury: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Mercury: 17.5 (#293)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1285 | 1460 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |

## Math

- Mercury: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1466 |

## Knowledge

- Mercury: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |

## Multimodal

- Mercury: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Mercury: 41.6 (#206)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury: 65.2 (#224)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1440 |

## Long Context

- Mercury: 38.4 (#198)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury: 46.2 (#221)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1191 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1282 | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mercury or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.