# Mercury vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

> Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-vs-qwen3-6-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 40.8 to 16.8.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 51.1 |
| Rank | 192 | 36 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mercury: 38.1 (#164)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.6 (#50)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1323 | 1472 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mercury: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,254 |

## Reasoning

- Mercury: 16.8 (#288)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 40.8 (#47)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1457 |
| SimpleBench | — | 63% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
| DTBench | — | 87.2% |
| LMCA | — | 42.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.27 |

## Math

- Mercury: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 52.2 (#40)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1465 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 23.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- Mercury: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#35)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 52% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1476 |

## Multilingual

- Mercury: 41.7 (#201)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.3 (#46)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1259 | 1436 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1487 |
| LMArena French | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1444 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1452 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury: 65.3 (#220)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.8 (#51)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1238 | 1437 |

## Long Context

- Mercury: 38.3 (#193)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#59)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1264 | 1457 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury: 46.2 (#216)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 64.0 (#58)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1283 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mercury or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.