# Mercury vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B

> Mercury and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.6 vs 37.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads 28.0 to 17.5.
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 37.6 |
| Rank | 199 | 201 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.49 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mercury: 38.7 (#170)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 37.2 (#196)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mercury: —
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 22.1 (#134)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 23% |

## Reasoning

- Mercury: 17.5 (#293)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 28.0 (#109)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.6% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1285 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 22% |
| DTBench | — | 73.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 44.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.93 |

## Math

- Mercury: —
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 38.9 (#121)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 20.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |

## Knowledge

- Mercury: —
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 51.3 (#68)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |

## Multilingual

- Mercury: 41.6 (#206)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury: 65.2 (#224)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |

## Long Context

- Mercury: 38.4 (#198)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury: 46.2 (#221)
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1191 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1282 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury better than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Mercury and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.6 vs 37.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Mercury or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 37.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has 14.