# Mercury vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 192 | 291 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mercury: 38.1 (#164)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1323 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |

## Reasoning

- Mercury: 16.8 (#288)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |

## Math

- Mercury: —
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |

## Knowledge

- Mercury: —
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |

## Multilingual

- Mercury: 41.7 (#201)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1259 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury: 65.3 (#220)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1238 | — |

## Long Context

- Mercury: 38.3 (#193)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1264 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury: 46.2 (#216)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1283 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mercury or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.1 vs 38.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.