# Mercury vs Qwen Max

> Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Max in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Mercury leads 38.1 to 30.3.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 34.4 |
| Rank | 192 | 226 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mercury: 38.1 (#164)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1323 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |

## Reasoning

- Mercury: 16.8 (#288)
- Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1270 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |

## Math

- Mercury: —
- Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1275 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- Mercury: —
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |

## Multilingual

- Mercury: 41.7 (#201)
- Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1259 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1329 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury: 65.3 (#220)
- Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1238 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- Mercury: 38.3 (#193)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1264 | 1289 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury: 46.2 (#216)
- Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1283 | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury better than Qwen Max?

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mercury or Qwen Max better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury and Qwen Max share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.