# Mercury vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Mercury and Olmo 3 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 24.9 to 16.8.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 192 | 182 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mercury: 38.1 (#164)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1323 | 1318 |

## Reasoning

- Mercury: 16.8 (#288)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1302 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |

## Math

- Mercury: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1315 |

## Knowledge

- Mercury: —
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1272 |

## Multilingual

- Mercury: 41.7 (#201)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1259 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1255 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury: 65.3 (#220)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1238 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Mercury: 38.3 (#193)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1264 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury: 46.2 (#216)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1283 | 1289 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Mercury and Olmo 3 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Mercury or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.1 vs 38.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.