# Mercury vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Mercury and Olmo 3.1 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 4 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 24.1 to 16.8.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 192 | 191 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mercury: 38.1 (#164)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1323 | 1292 |

## Reasoning

- Mercury: 16.8 (#288)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1272 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |

## Math

- Mercury: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Mercury: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1294 |

## Multilingual

- Mercury: 41.7 (#201)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1259 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1241 |
| LMArena French | — | 1262 |
| LMArena German | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1288 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury: 65.3 (#220)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1238 | 1246 |

## Long Context

- Mercury: 38.3 (#193)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1264 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury: 46.2 (#216)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Mercury | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1283 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Mercury and Olmo 3.1 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Mercury or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.1 vs 37.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.