# Mercury vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

> Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-vs-olmo-2-furious-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Mercury leads 38.1 to 28.1.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 29.2 |
| Rank | 192 | 301 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mercury: 38.1 (#164)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)

| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1323 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mercury: 16.8 (#288)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |

## Math

- Mercury: —
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |

## Knowledge

- Mercury: —
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)

| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |

## Multilingual

- Mercury: 41.7 (#201)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1259 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury: 65.3 (#220)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)

| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1238 | — |

## Long Context

- Mercury: 38.3 (#193)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1264 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury: 46.2 (#216)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)

| Benchmark | Mercury | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1283 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mercury or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.