# Mercury vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Flash in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 46.2.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 199 | 138 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mercury: 38.7 (#170)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Reasoning

- Mercury: 17.5 (#293)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1285 | 1420 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |

## Math

- Mercury: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |

## Knowledge

- Mercury: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- Mercury: 41.6 (#206)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1462 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury: 65.2 (#224)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Mercury: 38.4 (#198)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury: 46.2 (#221)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1191 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1282 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mercury or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.