# Mercury vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 17.5.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 48.5 |
| Rank | 199 | 55 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mercury: 38.7 (#170)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1504 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |

## Reasoning

- Mercury: 17.5 (#293)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1285 | 1482 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |
| CritPt | — | 12% |

## Math

- Mercury: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1468 |

## Knowledge

- Mercury: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1501 |

## Multimodal

- Mercury: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |

## Multilingual

- Mercury: 41.6 (#206)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1511 |
| LMArena French | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury: 65.2 (#224)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1463 |

## Long Context

- Mercury: 38.4 (#198)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | 1463 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury: 46.2 (#221)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1191 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1282 | 1451 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mercury or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.