# Mercury 2 vs Wizardlm 13b

> Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-2-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury 2 scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mercury 2 leads 53.8 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury 2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 175 | 274 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.75 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1391 | 1035 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1171 | — |
| SciCode | 38.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.58 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1362 | 1018 |
| CritPt | 0.8% | — |

## Math

- Mercury 2: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |

## Knowledge

- Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1304 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1329 | 1048 |

## Long Context

- Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1330 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1355 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1289 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1358 | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury 2 better than Wizardlm 13b?

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mercury 2 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Mercury 2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury 2 and Wizardlm 13b share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.
