# Mercury 2 vs Qwen3.6 Flash

> Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-2-vs-qwen3-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mercury 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.1 to 36.2.
- Mercury 2 is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.75 per million input/output tokens, against $0.19 / $1.13 for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Qwen3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 175 | 182 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | $0.75 | $1.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 785.58 | 326.4 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1171 | — |
| SciCode | 38.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1391 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| CritPt | 0.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1362 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |

## Math

- Mercury 2: —
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1304 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1329 | — |

## Long Context

- Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1330 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1289 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1358 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury 2 better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Qwen3.6 Flash?

Mercury 2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Flash lists at $0.19 and $1.13.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mercury 2 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.