# Mercury 2 vs Qwen3-1.7B

> Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-2-vs-qwen3-1-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mercury 2 leads 36.2 to 19.6.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury 2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 26.6 |
| Rank | 175 | 336 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.75 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1171 | — |
| SciCode | 38.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1391 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.58 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mercury 2: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |

## Reasoning

- Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1362 | — |

## Math

- Mercury 2: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |

## Knowledge

- Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1304 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1329 | — |

## Long Context

- Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1330 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1289 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1358 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury 2 better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury 2 and Qwen3-1.7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.