# Mercury 2 vs Qwen1.5-14B

> Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-2-vs-qwen1-5-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury 2 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mercury 2 leads 53.8 to 33.6.
- Qwen1.5-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury 2 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 175 | 253 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.75 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1391 | 1138 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1171 | — |
| SciCode | 38.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.58 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1362 | 1113 |
| CritPt | 0.8% | — |

## Math

- Mercury 2: —
- Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1125 |

## Knowledge

- Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | 1094 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.3% | — |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |

## Multilingual

- Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1147 |
| LMArena Russian | 1304 | 1046 |
| LMArena French | — | 1116 |
| LMArena German | — | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1085 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1329 | 1102 |

## Long Context

- Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1330 | 1113 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1355 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1289 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1358 | 1110 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury 2 better than Qwen1.5-14B?

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mercury 2 or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (33.5 vs 33.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury 2 and Qwen1.5-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.