# Mercury 2 vs Olmo 7b Instruct

> Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-2-vs-olmo-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury 2 scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mercury 2 leads 53.8 to 25.8.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury 2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 30.3 |
| Rank | 175 | 295 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.75 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1391 | 1016 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1171 | — |
| SciCode | 38.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.58 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1362 | 993 |
| CritPt | 0.8% | — |

## Math

- Mercury 2: —
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1018 |

## Knowledge

- Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1304 | 947 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1329 | 978 |

## Long Context

- Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1330 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1355 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1289 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1358 | 1007 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury 2 better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mercury 2 or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Mercury 2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury 2 and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.