# Mercury 2 vs Nova Premier 1.0

> Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-2-vs-nova-premier-1-0
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Mercury 2 leads 70.4 to 66.9.
- Mercury 2 is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.75 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury 2 | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 167 | 185 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.75 | $12.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mercury 2: 33.2 (#250)
- Nova Premier 1.0: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1170 | — |
| SciCode | 38.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1391 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.58 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mercury 2: 23.0 (#170)
- Nova Premier 1.0: 22.3 (#182)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 44.8% |
| CritPt | 0.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1362 | — |

## Math

- Mercury 2: —
- Nova Premier 1.0: 31.5 (#194)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 35% |

## Knowledge

- Mercury 2: 35.6 (#170)
- Nova Premier 1.0: 35.4 (#176)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 51.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | — |

## Multilingual

- Mercury 2: 46.8 (#153)
- Nova Premier 1.0: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1303 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury 2: 70.4 (#161)
- Nova Premier 1.0: 66.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 80.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1328 | — |

## Long Context

- Mercury 2: 40.4 (#149)
- Nova Premier 1.0: —

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1329 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury 2: 54.0 (#151)
- Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#174)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1289 | — |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1358 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury 2 better than Nova Premier 1.0?

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Nova Premier 1.0?

Mercury 2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury 2 and Nova Premier 1.0 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.