# Mercury 2 vs Muse Glimmer

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-2-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Muse Glimmer leads 40.4 to 33.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 38.7% for Mercury 2 and 44.9% for Muse Glimmer.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury 2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 175 | 131 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.75 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)
- Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1171 | 1355 |
| SciCode | 38.7% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1391 | 1416 |
| WeirdML | 43.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.58 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)
- Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.8% | 2.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1362 | 1396 |

## Math

- Mercury 2: —
- Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1417 |

## Knowledge

- Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | 1386 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)
- Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1304 | 1390 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)
- Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1329 | 1375 |

## Long Context

- Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1330 | 1382 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)
- Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1355 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1289 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1358 | 1399 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury 2 better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mercury 2 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury 2 and Muse Glimmer share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.