# Mercury 2 vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-2-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury 2 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 42.7 to 33.2.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.75 for Mercury 2.
- MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury 2 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 167 | 91 |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $0.75 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mercury 2: 33.2 (#250)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1391 | 1467 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1170 | — |
| SciCode | 38.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.58 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mercury 2: 23.0 (#170)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1362 | 1445 |
| CritPt | 0.8% | — |

## Math

- Mercury 2: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |

## Knowledge

- Mercury 2: 35.6 (#170)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | 1449 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Mercury 2: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |

## Multilingual

- Mercury 2: 46.8 (#153)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | 1469 |
| LMArena Russian | 1303 | 1412 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1318 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury 2: 70.4 (#161)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1328 | 1428 |

## Long Context

- Mercury 2: 40.4 (#149)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1329 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury 2: 54.0 (#151)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1355 | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1289 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1358 | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury 2 better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Mercury 2 lists at $0.25 and $0.75.

### Is Mercury 2 or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury 2 and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2 has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.