# Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> Mercury 2.5 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.5 vs 33.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-2-5-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Mercury 2.5 leads 39.5 to 22.6.
- Mercury 2.5 is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.66 / $1 for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
- Mercury 2.5 accepts more context: 260K tokens versus 33K.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.5 | 33.4 |
| Rank | 242 | 245 |
| Context | 260K | 33K |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $1 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mercury 2.5: 39.5 (#156)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| SciCode | 38.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1276 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| ALE-Bench | 301.65 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |

## Reasoning

- Mercury 2.5: 22.4 (#193)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1251 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |

## Math

- Mercury 2.5: 23.3 (#272)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |

## Knowledge

- Mercury 2.5: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |

## Multilingual

- Mercury 2.5: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1228 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury 2.5: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1223 |

## Long Context

- Mercury 2.5: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1251 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury 2.5: —
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury 2.5 better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Mercury 2.5 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.5 vs 33.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Mercury 2.5 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Mercury 2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-Coder-32B lists at $0.66 and $1.

### Is Mercury 2.5 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Mercury 2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Mercury 2.5 does, with 260K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury 2.5 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2.5 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.