# Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen1.5-7B

> Mercury 2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-2-5-vs-qwen1-5-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-7B leads 31.4 to 23.3.
- Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.5 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 242 | 273 |
| Context | 260K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mercury 2.5: 39.5 (#156)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1107 |
| ALE-Bench | 301.65 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mercury 2.5: 22.4 (#193)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1065 |

## Math

- Mercury 2.5: 23.3 (#272)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 3% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1080 |

## Knowledge

- Mercury 2.5: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |

## Multilingual

- Mercury 2.5: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1006 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury 2.5: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1058 |

## Long Context

- Mercury 2.5: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1090 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury 2.5: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1062 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury 2.5 better than Qwen1.5-7B?

Mercury 2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mercury 2.5 or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?

Mercury 2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury 2.5 and Qwen1.5-7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2.5 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.