# Mercury 2.5 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Mercury 2.5 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.5 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-2-5-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Mercury 2.5 leads 39.5 to 35.2.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury 2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 33.5 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 242 | 254 |
| Context | 260K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Mercury 2.5: 39.5 (#156)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |
| ALE-Bench | 301.65 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mercury 2.5: 22.4 (#193)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1208 |

## Math

- Mercury 2.5: 23.3 (#272)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |

## Knowledge

- Mercury 2.5: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |

## Multilingual

- Mercury 2.5: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury 2.5: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1186 |

## Long Context

- Mercury 2.5: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury 2.5: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1199 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1221 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury 2.5 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Mercury 2.5 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.5 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Mercury 2.5 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Mercury 2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury 2.5 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2.5 has 4 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.