# Mercury 2.5 vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni has enough public results to be ranked (#91); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mercury-2-5-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 36.4 to 22.4.
- Mercury 2.5 is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Omni.
- MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 260K.

## Snapshot

| | Mercury 2.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 42.9 |
| Rank | — | 91 |
| Context | 260K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mercury 2.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1467 |
| ALE-Bench | 301.65 | — |

## Reasoning

- Mercury 2.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1445 |

## Math

- Mercury 2.5: 22.4
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 3% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |

## Knowledge

- Mercury 2.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |

## Multimodal

- Mercury 2.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |

## Multilingual

- Mercury 2.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1469 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1318 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Mercury 2.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1428 |

## Long Context

- Mercury 2.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mercury 2.5: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | Mercury 2.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Mercury 2.5 better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni has enough public results to be ranked (#91); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Which is cheaper, Mercury 2.5 or MiMo-V2-Omni?

Mercury 2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Omni lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 260K.

### How many benchmarks do Mercury 2.5 and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2.5 has 2 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.