# Magistral Small vs QwQ-32B

> QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-small-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 1 category and QwQ-32B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where QwQ-32B leads 22.9 to 6.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 30% for Magistral Small and 59.2% for QwQ-32B.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Small | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 289 | 153 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172)
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| SciCode | 35.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1333 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | 5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | 137.6 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1326 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253)
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1323 |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Small: —
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1378 |
| LMArena French | — | 1337 |
| LMArena German | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Small: —
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1297 |

## Long Context

- Magistral Small: —
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1308 |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Small: —
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1288 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1314 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Small better than QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Magistral Small or QwQ-32B better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and QwQ-32B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.