# Magistral Small vs Qwen3 8B

> Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-small-vs-qwen3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 8B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 8B leads 16.1 to 6.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 30% for Magistral Small and 56.1% for Qwen3 8B.
- Qwen3 8B is cheaper at $0.18 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $1.50 for Magistral Small.
- Qwen3 8B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Small | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 33.3 |
| Rank | 289 | 237 |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172)
- Qwen3 8B: 33.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.2% | 22.6% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen3 8B: 29.9 (#71)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345)
- Qwen3 8B: 16.1 (#299)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.3% | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | 5% |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 59.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | 136.17 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |

## Math

- Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253)
- Qwen3 8B: 33.3 (#176)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | 56.1% |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215)
- Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#164)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |

## Long Context

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen3 8B: 37.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Small better than Qwen3 8B?

Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Magistral Small or Qwen3 8B?

Qwen3 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Magistral Small lists at $0.50 and $1.50.

### Is Magistral Small or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 8B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Qwen3 8B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.