# Magistral Small vs Qwen3 14B

> Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-small-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 14B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 14B leads 37.0 to 24.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 6.3% for Magistral Small and 49.1% for Qwen3 14B.
- Qwen3 14B is cheaper at $0.35 / $1.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $1.50 for Magistral Small.
- Qwen3 14B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Small | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 35.0 |
| Rank | 289 | 222 |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $1.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172)
- Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.2% | 31.6% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | 49.1% |
| CritPt | 0.3% | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | 4% |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 64% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | 138.23 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |

## Math

- Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | 66.4% |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215)
- Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |

## Long Context

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Small better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Magistral Small or Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.40 per million output tokens; Magistral Small lists at $0.50 and $1.50.

### Is Magistral Small or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 36.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 14B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Qwen3 14B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.