# Magistral Small vs Qwen2.5-Max

> Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-small-vs-qwen2-5-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5-Max leads 24.6 to 6.9.
- Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 40.1 |
| Rank | 289 | 142 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.2 (#118)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1359 |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 24.6 (#144)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | 132.54 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1360 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |

## Math

- Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 34.3 (#162)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1369 |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 34.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1337 |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen2.5-Max: 48.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1382 |
| LMArena French | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1377 |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen2.5-Max: 71.5 (#147)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1335 |

## Long Context

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.3 (#137)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen2.5-Max: 55.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1339 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1364 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Small better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Magistral Small or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

Qwen2.5-Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.2 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Qwen2.5-Max share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.