# Magistral Small vs Qwen1.5-72B

> Magistral Small and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.2 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-small-vs-qwen1-5-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Magistral Small leads 30.9 to 11.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 56.1% for Magistral Small and 28.8% for Qwen1.5-72B.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 296 | 285 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1148 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | — |

## Math

- Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1164 |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | 28.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1136 |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1186 |
| LMArena French | — | 1159 |
| LMArena German | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1110 |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1141 |

## Long Context

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Small better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Magistral Small and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.2 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Magistral Small or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Qwen1.5-72B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.