# Magistral Small vs Qwen-14B

> Magistral Small and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.9 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-small-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 1 category and Qwen-14B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen-14B leads 18.7 to 6.9.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 289 | 273 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172)
- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1072 |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345)
- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | 112.8 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1027 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253)
- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1077 |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1029 |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Small: —
- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Small better than Qwen-14B?

Magistral Small and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.9 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Magistral Small or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Qwen-14B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.