# Magistral Small vs Muse Spark 1.1

> Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index. Magistral Small costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-small-vs-muse-spark-1-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 47.1 to 6.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 61.3% for Magistral Small and 94.4% for Muse Spark 1.1.
- Magistral Small is cheaper at $0.50 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.1.
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Small | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 49.9 |
| Rank | 296 | 51 |
| Context | 128K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $4.25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.2% | 58.8% |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1542 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1498 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Magistral Small: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 31.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 15% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.3% | 15.1% |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 94.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | 154.21 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 84.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1486 |
| LMCA | — | 49.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |

## Math

- Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 39% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1483 |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)
- Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 57.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |

## Multimodal

- Magistral Small: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1465 |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Small: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1518 |
| LMArena French | — | 1494 |
| LMArena German | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1483 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1464 |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Small: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1457 |

## Long Context

- Magistral Small: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1462 |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Small: —
- Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1437 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1927 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1485 |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Small better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index. Magistral Small costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Magistral Small or Muse Spark 1.1?

Magistral Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

### Is Magistral Small or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.