# Magistral Small vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-small-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 28.6 to 6.9.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $1.50 for Magistral Small.
- MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
- Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 289 | 91 |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1467 |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1445 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | — |

## Math

- Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |

## Multimodal

- Magistral Small: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Small: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1469 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1318 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Small: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1428 |

## Long Context

- Magistral Small: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Small: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Small better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Magistral Small or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Magistral Small lists at $0.50 and $1.50.

### Is Magistral Small or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.