# Magistral Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-small-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 30.4 to 6.9.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $1.50 for Magistral Small.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 46.7 |
| Rank | 289 | 55 |
| Context | 128K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $1.50 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1618 |
| SciCode | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1538 |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1511 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | — |

## Math

- Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1497 |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1548 |

## Multimodal

- Magistral Small: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1265 |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Small: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1481 |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Small: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1490 |

## Long Context

- Magistral Small: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1500 |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Small: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)

| Benchmark | Magistral Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1463 |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Small better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Magistral Small or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Magistral Small lists at $0.50 and $1.50.

### Is Magistral Small or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.