# Magistral Medium vs Qwen3.5-Flash

> Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-medium-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5-Flash in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 32.9 to 8.7.
- Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
- Qwen3.5-Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 224 | 105 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $5 | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.9 (#234)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1412 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1243 |
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 221.8 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Magistral Medium: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 32.9 (#63)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | 1404 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.98 |

## Math

- Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 36.3 (#117)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1249 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#84)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1222 | 1408 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | 1268 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1248 | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1176 | 1369 |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1269 | 1399 |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.8 (#133)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | 1392 |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 58.2 (#117)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Medium better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

### Is Magistral Medium or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5-Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.