# Magistral Medium vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-medium-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 25.9 to 8.6.
- Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.2 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 227 | 181 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $5 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1314 |
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | 1299 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |

## Math

- Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1250 | 1298 |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1289 |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1227 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1248 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1267 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1271 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Medium better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Magistral Medium or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (39.1 vs 38.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.