# Magistral Medium vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

> Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-medium-vs-qwen2-5-72b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Magistral Medium leads 32.4 to 18.1.
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is cheaper at $1.40 / $5.60 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 31.5 |
| Rank | 224 | 259 |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $1.40 |
| Output $/M | $5 | $5.60 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 32.8 (#256)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1293 |
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 16% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.9% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Magistral Medium: —
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.0 (#124)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 5.7% |
| BALROG | — | 16.2% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 35.8% |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 21.4 (#197)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | 1271 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| DTBench | — | 62.9% |
| LMCA | — | 13.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 129.01 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| HellaSwag | — | 84.8% |
| PIQA | — | 82.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 82.3% |

## Math

- Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 18.1 (#281)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1249 | 1283 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 33% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 63.2% |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 26.9 (#247)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1222 | 1245 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 63.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 19.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 94.5% |
| MMLU | — | 85.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 71.9% |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.2 (#208)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | 1252 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1272 |
| LMArena French | 1268 | 1279 |
| LMArena German | 1248 | 1234 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1176 | 1180 |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | 1188 |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | 1264 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1269 | 1255 |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1254 |
| IFEval | — | 80.6% |

## Long Context

- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#183)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | 1282 |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1269 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | 1221 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1272 |
| WildBench | — | 80.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Medium better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $1.40 per million input tokens and $5.60 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

### Is Magistral Medium or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.