# Magistral Medium vs Qwen1.5-110B

> Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-medium-vs-qwen1-5-110b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 21.7 to 8.7.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Medium | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 33.6 |
| Rank | 224 | 231 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $5 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1184 |
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | 1168 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |

## Math

- Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1249 | 1185 |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1222 | 1144 |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1268 | 1150 |
| LMArena German | 1248 | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1176 | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1269 | 1141 |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1158 |

## Long Context

- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Medium better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Magistral Medium or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Qwen1.5-110B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.