# Magistral Medium vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-medium-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Magistral Medium leads 33.5 to 9.1.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Medium | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.2 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 227 | 306 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $5 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1250 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1227 | — |
| LMArena French | 1267 | — |
| LMArena German | 1248 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1271 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | — |

## Long Context

- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Medium better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Magistral Medium or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.