# Magistral Medium vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-medium-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 24.1 to 8.7.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 224 | 191 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $5 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1292 |
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | 1272 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |

## Math

- Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1249 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1222 | 1294 |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1241 |
| LMArena French | 1268 | 1262 |
| LMArena German | 1248 | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1269 | 1288 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1246 |

## Long Context

- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Medium better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Magistral Medium or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.