# Magistral Medium vs o1-pro

> Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/magistral-medium-vs-o1-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 1 category and o1-pro in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where o1-pro leads 20.2 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 6.1% for Magistral Medium and 23.3% for o1-pro.
- Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2 / $5 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
- o1-pro accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.
- Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Magistral Medium | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 31.2 |
| Rank | 224 | 264 |
| Context | 128K | 200K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $150 |
| Output $/M | $5 | $600 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161)
- o1-pro: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | — |

## Reasoning

- Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342)
- o1-pro: 20.2 (#223)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | 23.3% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | — |

## Math

- Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187)
- o1-pro: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1249 | — |

## Knowledge

- Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199)
- o1-pro: 29.3 (#227)

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1222 | — |

## Multilingual

- Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219)
- o1-pro: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | — |
| LMArena French | 1268 | — |
| LMArena German | 1248 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1269 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207)
- o1-pro: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | — |

## Long Context

- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178)
- o1-pro: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214)
- o1-pro: —

| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Magistral Medium better than o1-pro?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or o1-pro?

Magistral Medium is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.

### Which has the bigger context window?

o1-pro does, with 200K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and o1-pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.